eese.

Example, Mark Rothko is just as relevant as Fragonard.There are many, many artist similar to them but you just wouldn’t compare Dali to Vladimir-Kush. You can damn near see the differences in brush strokes, their so strikingly separate even though they umbrella what exactly a Surrealist is. See, if you create a new way of thinking or revisit an established idea but reinterpret it in an entirely revolutionary, individual way than you are an innovator. I choose to say extremist, a quality most cannot accept, the idea of wanting to live a life presumibly difficult as that of a “Starving” artist desperate to paint her thoughts whilst at the same time in a way unfamiliar. (my favorite cruel phrase) Why not get a “real” job writing like Sanskrit for a  Greeding card company.  I don’t do this to please anyone else, or even myself really, I just paint what I see in my head because I have too.

Refusing to argue anymore….

Apparently it makes me arrogant to not want to show technique through elegant flowers and brilliant landscapes. I do not dismiss anyone who dose, it take many years of practice and dedication, I just believe there is a very, very thin line I personally don’t want to stumble upon. Many Artist enjoy it, Im sure but once again she as one of many asked what I thought. Plainly,I’m just not interested, what dose that prove? Certainly not a point of view so I said more.  Id rather the Louvre over Wal-mart, if its 20 years from now or Never then so be it.  Not interested in the money, I just want to pull every thought out of my crowded mind and plaster it on to canvas.Unfortunately for some this is difficult to understand. Society views on the Art world will forever be stagnant, its an insurmountable fear that lingers in the minds of an average person with no Visually artistic background to believe that another can recreate thoughts and emotions in away that  to them seem unimportant.